Verdict with Dan Abrams

{"contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"verdict"}

Justice Served in Sean Bell Case?

It certainly sounds terrible enough, a groom shot and killed by cops just hours before his wedding... and we're not talking just a couple of shots... but 50! But today a judge ruled the cops who fired the shots were not guilty. Sounds pretty outrageous but is it really? What do you think?
Dan debates tonight with attorney Ron Kuby who thinks the judge got it wrong... very wrong.

{"contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"verdict"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":1735577,"authorDomain":"phobrien31"}

Dan's arguments, with Ron Kuby, justifying the verdict in the Sean Bell case were outrageous. His justification of the 50 shot onslaught is sickening. One can't escape thinking that either he or his dad are friends of the judge. I can understand the reluctance of the judge to bring a just verdict, it would immediately enrage the entire NYPD, all of whom carry guns. I can only imagine how intimidating a courtroom full of police officers can be. Judge Roy Bean would have been intimidated. As Kuby pointed out, fair trials in New York involving police officers are not possible.

{"commentId":1735577,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"phobrien31"}
    Reply#1 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:47 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1735610,"authorDomain":"fweidner"}

    Evening,

    I was sadly disappointed with the verdict in the Sean Bell case. I wish I could say that this was an isolated incident here in the big apple, but it isn't. As citizens of this great city, it is up to us to demand more from the officers that have sworn to protect and serve. Can we get a copy of the police training procedures? As a New yorker, I think the rule should be that when there is more than one cop approaching a suspect that the senior officer and only the senior officer in charge should have the authority to give the order to fire. I would even go so far as to say we should demand that cops only fire if they are fired upon! Give the cops all the tools they need to confront suspects with non lethal force. If that means that we pay more for bullet proof vest and the like that is fine. What isn't acceptable is the continued practice of shooting first and assessing the scene later.

    {"commentId":1735610,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"fweidner"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
    {"commentId":1743489,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

    Frederick

    Being a lover of NYC, and having once lived there and having relatives there now your position is, frankly, ridiculous.

    You would have no policeman. A policeman has to be able to protect himself.

    It surprises me how many people, who have never been in a life threatening situation, or even a potentially life threatening situation constantly second guess those who are put in one.

    I can certainly get on board with more training, better pay, etc for cops, but are you willing to pay for it? Are you willing to forego some other aspect of service to have them trained for months and months, instead of a much shorter time?

    Most New Yorkers I know say, no way.

    {"commentId":1743489,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:12 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":1745764,"authorDomain":"fweidner"}

    Funny that you think my position is ridiculous, as I have friends in the military serving right now who inform me that this is the policy they use doing house to house searches in the war zone. That is why I suggested it. If kids fresh out of boot camp can be trained to work as a unit under those guidelines I have every confidence our police officers can. A Policeman has more than his gun to protect himself. He has bullet proof shields and riot helmets and tons of non lethal weapons at their disposal. I also would like to point that you make a lot of assumptions for someone who doesn't know me. I come from a proud military family, and know first hand that there are better ways to confront a situation than what we saw in the Sean Bell case. I have lived over half my life here, raised my children here, and have nothing but respect for the Police who do their best to protect and serve. I'm curious, why did you leave the big apple? Since I'm still here, I would really like to see a change. There are other nations that do have tighter restrictions on the use of firearms, and they have no shortage of officers. All I am asking is that we look at how our police are trained, and how we can do better. Poor training is no cheaper than good training, but since you asked, yes I am willing to pay for better training and equipment that saves lives.

    {"commentId":1745764,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"fweidner"}
      Reply#3 - Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:43 AM EDT
      {"commentId":1745907,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

      Frederick:

      My point was that most New Yorkers are not willing to pay for that.

      Also, you completely miss the difference between Iraq and the USA. The soldiers in Iraq need not knock when they rush a house, they do not have the constraints that the police here have. If this had occurred in NYC, ie, a car full of unknown men which was used, being nice, as a potential weapon and the soldiers heard someone in the car say get the weapons, you can be assured that the car would have been riddled with .223 holes.

      There are many imponderables here. I saw a video once of a confrontation between a police officer and a potential perp. The cop was demanding that the guy (after a chase) throw up his hands, not to move, get on the ground. Screaming it at him. The guy reached into his jacket and pulled something out that looked like a gun, the cop shot him. It was a cellphone.

      Fact is that here, according to the articles I have read, the cops had identified themselves and after such identification one was hit by Bell's car (or the car he was in). One of the cops heard one of the guys with Bell say "Yo, go get my gun."

      Bad facts. I would like citations as to other nations which have tighter restrictions on the use of firearms (by police).

      One thing which is not mentioned here, is the subliminal issues. How many incidents of violence have occurred between blacks, at nightclubs, because of minimal arguments? How many have involved illegal firearms? How does that work into the mind of police involved in a potentially explosive situation?

      These are the issues, behind the issues. One which people should really talk about, consider. But, due to the unwritten rule that you can't talk about these things, then they go unsaid, though everyone understands and knows about them.

      All weird, all strange.

      {"commentId":1745907,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
      • 1 vote
      #3.1 - Tue Apr 29, 2008 9:36 AM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":1747840,"authorDomain":"fweidner"}

      Your last paragraph is my exact point. It is time that we look at both the written and unwritten rules that govern police conduct. Also, please take care when you challenge an argument by claiming that the speaker is using "bad facts" if you aren't willing to check them yourself. But to satisfy your question I will name two. One is England, where the street cop doesn't even carry a gun, only their tactical officers do, and South Africa, where they actually require that an ambulance be on scene when their tactical units are called upon. We can, and should do better here.
      . I would love to know which articles you got your info from. I fallowed the trial very closely, and according to everything I read, saw, and heard the only ones who heard the police identify themselves were the officers involved. Again, it was only the officers on the scene that "heard" one of Bell's party say anything about a gun.It would have helped the officers if there had been at least one witness who could have backed up their version.

      There have been too many incidents here where cops have taken the lives of innocents. They all involved police officers who acted out of fear instead of sound judgement. The crux of my argument is that we need to look at why there is such fear, and how we can help our officers develop strategies that both protect them and the people they are confronting. Don't you?

      {"commentId":1747840,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"fweidner"}
        Reply#4 - Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:17 PM EDT
        {"commentId":1750308,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

        Frederick:

        As to England cops not carrying guns, that has and is changing.

        Here is a NYT op/ed:

        Ny Times re: arming Brits

        Also, England is experiencing horrific increases in armed robberies. The tighter they control the ownership of private guns, the higher number of armed robberies and other violent crimes are committed. Seems to be a pretty direct correlation there.

        Again, I hate to say this but many times it is the word of the police officer against "perps." I am sure that cops lie, many have I suppose to protect their own butts. But so do those who are saying the cops acted improperly. In fact, people lie, period.

        The crux of my argument is that we need to look at why there is such fear, and how we can help our officers develop strategies that both protect them and the people they are confronting. Don't you?

        Yup. And one of the issues is the purposeful elevation of violence for violence's sake in the black community. Seems to me that the manner in which many in the black community pray at the altar of violent people, violent music, violence, violence, violence, is one of the reasons people believe that blacks (especially if dressed in certain ways, or if they exhibit certain language, actions) are more prone to violence.

        Is that something the cops should address? Probably, but probably not in the way you mean.

        Is this a tragedy, yup. It is also tragic when humans who act like animals go around killing and maiming for sport. Which type of tragedy happens more often? Should we not act to address the more prevalent tragedy first?

        I agree that all police officers should receive more training, and more specialized training, especially with firearms. But there are many underlying reasons for the way officers act towards certain segments of the population, and all of us, including those people in those segments of the population should understand this.

        {"commentId":1750308,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
        • 1 vote
        #4.1 - Wed Apr 30, 2008 11:13 AM EDT
        {"commentId":1752819,"authorDomain":"goldnchyl"}

        wmolaw,

        Apparently, you don't know many black people. For you to encapsulate the entirety of African American culture-- those who were brought here in shackles, subjected to an unspeakable existence, rise up, get beat down, rise up, get beat down, rise up, get beat down, by a historically violent culture....-- into the ghetto mentality that plagues many communities now, is at best irresponsible. At least have some clue of what you're talking about. Black people have contributed so much to this country and received so much disdain. Blamed for psychological and emotional ills that were not of their making. America wouldn't be what it is today without the four hundred years of free labor from the millions of African people that were brutally stolen from their homeland and the subsequent jewels that have blessed this land since. The best and the brightest were taken and the evidence of that ability is clear when one studies the fullness of black history. And now, a portion of this culture is in jeopardy of self-annihilation. The manifestation of a self-hatred that, while may be self-perpetuated, was not self-generated. I guess you believe that this is due to some inherent flaw in the African genome. Nevermind the violence that's been systematically perpetuated against blacks by the police, in general, and the NYC police in particular. Amadou Bailo Diallo's violent death has been well documented. Another case of wrongful overkill where the cops got off without even a slap on the wrist. But I guess, for you, it doesn't matter. They're all a bunch of inconsequentials?? Nevermind the fact that black against white violence falls short in the history of violence in America, when compared to the senseless, shameless, and violent acts of whites against blacks, even today. All Americans have far more to fear from the ever stockpiling brotherhood of Tim McVey who live comfortably in relative anonymity, in the mountains of Montana. I can understand why you might not want to consider the consequences of slavery, or the benefits of being white in America. Nevermind that many Americans of all hues have suffered at the hands of over-zealous police officers with too little training and far too much power. Your perspective, wmolaw, seems extremely narrow and lacking in any real intro and/or circumspection.

        {"commentId":1752819,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"goldnchyl"}
          #4.2 - Wed Apr 30, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
          {"commentId":1753706,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

          gold:

          Look, the fact is that a segment of the black population (and it has leeched out into other segments of other populations) glorifies violence, glorifies crime, glorifies weapons, glorifies killing cops, etc. This is a fact.

          You can argue all you want about WHY they do this, but a cop on the street could care less.

          There is also no doubt but that the percentage of violent crime committed by blacks is much higher than the percentage of blacks in the population.

          Bureau of Justice Stats

          Whether it is black against black, or black against white, blacks commit a far greater percentage of violent crime than their representation in society warrants.

          Although the reasons "why" can be discussed ad infinitum, although it can be investigated and hopefully addressed rationally, the fact is that it is happening NOW, and the cops know it, you should know it, and the population as a whole should know it.

          They (the cops and, indeed, the population as a whole) must deal with the reality today, not the "what if" issues you wish to discuss.

          And it seems to me that everyone, including the black leaders, the black community, must then seek to address the issues which cause this violent behavior.

          {"commentId":1753706,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
          • 1 vote
          #4.3 - Thu May 1, 2008 8:23 AM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":1750616,"authorDomain":"fweidner"}

          Well, I am glad to hear that we can at least agree that police need better training. I don't expect them to solve the problems of our society, many of which you correctly point out are a factor in the threats they face. But we as a society can do a lot to fix the problems with in the Police force. Discipline, and a better understanding of how to deal with these situations will help the police not hinder them. I admit I hold a high standard for the conduct of our officers, but I am confident that with more public pressure from us they can meet our goals and take fear out of the equation.

          I have enjoyed the conversation, take care.

          {"commentId":1750616,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"fweidner"}
          • 1 vote
          Reply#5 - Wed Apr 30, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
          {"commentId":1751268,"authorDomain":"wmolaw"}

          Frederick:

          It is an endeavor which must be shared by all segments of the population.

          Cops are humans, humans have emotions, and emotions can cause actions.

          Cops also have power and are usually armed. Hence, it should be lesson 101 that when confronted by a cop one should not exacerbate or inflame the situation.

          That lesson is lost on many, many people.

          {"commentId":1751268,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"wmolaw"}
          • 1 vote
          #5.1 - Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":1751336,"authorDomain":"nessa25510"}

          Does anyone stop to realize just how many seconds it took to fire 31 shots. 12.4 secs is all it took for the one cop to fire this many shots. The other cops fired less. They had ricochet bullets coming back at them. They wouldn't have known which bullets were coming from where. And if the prosecution witness weren't reliable, what were their backgrounds? What kind of people did the cops "know" they were dealing with because they were undercover with them. You can't just read a headline and take judgement without looking at the actual characters of the issue. It has nothing to do with race, or the blue wall. It has more to do with the fact that these police officers had no reason to have malice behind the mistake that was made. And the officer that fired 31 shots should be judged in a different light the the other 2.

          {"commentId":1751336,"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323","authorDomain":"nessa25510"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#6 - Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:14 PM EDT
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"255734","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"255734","contentId":"1453323"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking
          RSS feedSyndicate this contentRecent Articles & Seeds
          Verdict's Latest Comments
          No comments have been posted yet.
          Verdict's Recent Votes
          Verdict has not voted for any articles or seeds yet.
          Comments & Feedback
          – Show More